Update: Arbitrator Taking a Fresh Look at Whether Cintas Arbitration Agreements Permit Class/Collective Arbitration / Trial for Plaintiffs Litigating in Federal Court Now Set for March 2009 / Supreme Court Rejects Cintas' Bid for Review of Its Lawsuits Against SSRs

San Francisco Arbitration To Go Forward:

In April 2008, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong's September 2007 order, which had prohibited the arbitrating plaintiffs from proceeding as a group. The appeals court sent the issue back to Arbitrator Bruce Meyerson, with instructions to exercise his full authority under the arbitration agreements to decide for himself whether the arbitration agreements prohibited group arbitration. Arbitrator Meyerson is now considering the parties' arguments on the issue, and will have a hearing on July 17, 2008 before issuing a new award. We hope he will rule that the agreements allow all arbitrating plaintiffs to participate in the San Francisco arbitration and that the arbitration should get underway promptly.

Litigating Plaintiffs Set for Trial in March 2009:

In the federal court litigation, the judge has now set trial for March 23, 2009, for those plaintiffs who did not have enforceable arbitration agreements with Cintas. The case has been reassigned for trial to Magistrate Judge Richard Seeborg in San Jose. We are now completing discovery relevant to the trial of the litigating plaintiffs' claims.

We expect Cintas to resume its efforts to have various plaintiffs dismissed from the litigation for various legal and factual reasons. If you are contacted by a member of our legal team for information relating to the case, please respond promptly, to help us develop the information we need to present your case most effectively.

Supreme Court Refuses Cintas’ Bid for Review of its Federal Court Lawsuits Against Certain SSRs:

On June 16, 2008, the United States Supreme Court refused Cintas' request for review of an April order from the Court of Appeals, which deferred any ruling on Cintas' dozens of lawsuits against around the country against its SSRs. Those cases have all been stayed, which means that for the foreseeable future, Cintas will not be able to proceed with its efforts to use those cases to force its SSRs to arbitrate their claims individually.

* * *

As always, if you are contacted by a member of our litigation team with questions about this case or your claims, it is extremely important for you to respond promptly to any such requests. The information we obtain from you is critical for us to be able to pursue your claims. Also, please keep our legal team informed of any changes to your address, telephone number, or email address, so that we can contact you. Use the contact form on this website to update your contact information.



This web site provides information about a nationwide class action lawsuit for unpaid overtime premiums against Cintas Corporation, brought by current and former route drivers. At last count, approximately 2,200 individual drivers have joined the lawsuit, from 42 states and hundreds of locations throughout the country.

This case was filed by several dozen Cintas drivers in U.S. District Court in San Francisco on March 19, 2003. Plaintiffs allege that Cintas Corporation violated the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and various state overtime laws by not paying overtime to its drivers who worked more than 40 hours per week. For more information, see the following links:
Court Documents
Q&A
Contact Us